Sierra Club Home Page   Environmental Update   My Backyard
chapter button
Explore, enjoy and protect the planet
Click here to visit the Member Center.         
Search
Take Action
Get Outdoors
Join or Give
Inside Sierra Club
Press Room
Politics & Issues
Sierra Magazine
Sierra Club Books
Apparel and Other Merchandise
Contact Us

Join the Sierra ClubWhy become a member? Explore, Enjoy and Protect

Search Sierra:

  Sierra Magazine
  May/June 2006
Table of Contents
 
  FEATURES:
Interview With a Whale
Decoder: Miles to Go
Between Two Worlds
Interview: Jane Goodall
Going for Broke
 
  DEPARTMENTS:
Letters
Ways & Means
One Small Step
Lay of the Land
Profile
Good Going
The Green Life
Hey Mr. Green
Sierra Club Bulletin
Last Words
 
  MORE:
Subscribe!
Search Sierra Magazine
Sierra Archives
Corrections
About Sierra
Internships at Sierra
Advertising Information
Current Advertisers

Sierra Magazine
click here to print this article! click here to tell a friend

Decoder: Miles to Go Before You Eat
Why it pays to buy locally grown food
by Paul Rauber

Posted May 31, 2006
Editor's note: Subsequent to the publication of this feature, Sierra learned that there was a calculation error in the original paper on which the article was based, "The Load Less Traveled," (Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, 2002). In addition, Sierra's own calculations failed to account for the differing fuel-energy values of gasoline (light truck), diesel (commercial truck), bunker oil (ship), and jet fuel (air). We also neglected to cite the weight of our example produce; e.g., the potato was large, weighing one pound. Together, these errors led us to significantly overstate the amount of fuel needed to move the items to market.

What follows are the Leopold Center's recalculations of the fuel requirements to transport various produce to market. Remember that for the purpose of this example, the "market" was designated to be Des Moines, Iowa.

Calculations for estimating energy (fuel) requirements to transport various produce:

  1. Estimates for transport of goods by various modes:

    Mode of transport Energy requirement Source
    Ship 80 kcal/ton/km Pimentel et al., 2004
    Truck 820 kcal/ton/km Pimentel et al., 2004
    Air 6,995 kcal/ton/km (See "References" below for explanation)

    kcal = kilocalories

  2. Convert to kcal/ton/mile:

    Ship: 50 kcal/ton/mile
    Truck: 510 kcal/ton/mile
    Air: 4,372 kcal/ton/mile

  3. Input distances traveled by produce and mode of transport, from source to Des Moines food store:

    • Apple (Iowa) – 60 miles by light truck (gas)
    • Apple (Washington) – 1,722 miles by commercial truck (diesel)
    • Grapes (California) – 1,887 miles by commercial truck (diesel)
    • Grapes (Chile) – 5,585 miles by ship (residual fuel oil); 1,683 miles by commercial truck (diesel)
    • Potato (North Dakota) – 558 miles by commercial truck (diesel)
    • Potato (Idaho) – 1,246 miles by commercial truck (diesel)
    • Pineapple (Costa Rica) - 1,211 miles by ship (residual fuel oil); 1,466 miles by commercial truck (diesel)
    • Pineapples (Hawaii) - 2,551 miles by plane (kerosene jet fuel); 1,683 miles by commercial truck (diesel). (Only specialty Hawaiian pineapples are shipped by air. Most come in the same fashion as the Costa Rican fruit, by sea and truck.)

  4. Calculate the kcal needed per pound of produce transported:

    • Apple (Iowa) – 15
    • Apple (Washington) – 439
    • Grapes (California) – 481
    • Grapes (Chile) – 139 by ship; 429 by truck
    • Potato (North Dakota) – 142
    • Potato (Idaho) – 317
    • Pineapple (Costa Rica) 30 by ship; 373 by truck
    • Pineapple (Hawaii) 5,576 by plane; 429 by truck

  5. Fuel-energy values of various fuels:

    Oxygenate gas (truck) – 123,000 BTU/gallon
    Distillate fuel oil - #2 Diesel (truck) – 139,000 BTU/gallon
    Kerosene jet fuel (air) – 135,000 BTU/gallon
    Residual fuel oil (ship) – 150,000 BTU/gallon

    Conversion: 1 BTU = 0.252 kcal

  6. Convert to cups of fuel per pound of produce transported:

    • Apple (Iowa) – 0.01
    • Apple (Washington) – 0.2
    • Grapes (California) – 0.22
    • Grapes (Chile) – 0.06 by ship; 0.2 by truck (0.26 total)
    • Potato (North Dakota) – 0.065
    • Potato (Idaho) – 0.14
    • Pineapple (Costa Rica) 0.01 by ship; 0.17 by truck (0.18 total)
    • Pineapple (Hawaii) 2.62 by plane; 0.2 by truck (2.82 total)

  7. Weights of produce pictured:

    • Apple (Iowa) – .6 pounds
    • Apple (Washington) – .6 pounds
    • Grapes (California) – 1 pound bunch
    • Grapes (Chile) – 1 pound bunch
    • Potato (North Dakota) – 1 pound
    • Potato (Idaho) – 1 pound
    • Pineapple (Costa Rica) – 3 pounds
    • Pineapple (Hawaii) – 3 pounds

  8. Volume of fuel needed to transport produce:

    • Apple (Iowa) – 0.048 ounces (0.288 teaspoons)
    • Apple (Washington) – 0.96 ounces (5.76 teaspoons)
    • One-pound bunch of grapes (California) – 1.76 ounces (3.5 tablespoons)
    • One-pound bunch of grapes (Chile) – 2.1 ounces (4.2 tablespoons)
    • Potato (North Dakota) - 0.52 ounces (1 tablespoon)
    • Potato (Idaho) - 1.12 ounces (2.25 tablespoons)
    • Pineapple (Costa Rica) - 4.32 ounces (0.54 cup)
    • Pineapple (Hawaii) - 67.68 ounces (0.529 gallons)

References

  1. D. Pimentel, A. Pleasant, J. Barron, J. Gaudioso, N. Pollock, E. Chae, Y. Kim, A. Lassiter, C. Schiavoni, A. Jackson, M. Lee and A. Eaton. 2004. "U.S Energy Conservation and Efficiency: Benefits and Costs." Environment Development and Sustainability 6: 279-305.

Transport by air

To arrive at the energy used to transport goods by air for the Hawaiian pineapple calculation, we used the total fuel consumption of jet fuel and the total revenue ton-miles by air to arrive at the figure of 6,995 kcal/ton/km (or 4,372 kcal/ton/mile).


Up to Top


HOME | Email Signup | About Us | Contact Us | Terms of Use | © 2008 Sierra Club